Research Articles, XV, 1

Research Articles, XV, 1

THE PROBLEM OF RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY OR DISAGREEMENT: RECENT FORMULATIONS AND SOLUTIONS (pages 7-23)

Domingos FARIA ABSTRACT: In this paper, we have two goals: Firstly, we intend to examine the most robust recent formulation of the problem of religious diversity or disagreement. We will argue that Sanford Goldberg’s version is better than John Greco’s. Secondly, we aim to examine different solutions and develop a new one based on Ernest Sosa’s virtue epistemology as a …

Read More »

A PHENOMENOLOGICAL SOLUTION TO GETTIER’S PROBLEM (pages 25-31)

Mohsen HASANNEZHAD ABSTRACT: In “Is Justified True Belief, Knowledge?” Gettier shows us two counter examples of analyzing Knowledge, as “Justified True Belief” or “JTB”. Lots of scholars have reconstructed similar counter examples to JTB but we can see they follow a similar algorithm. Other scholars have tried to re-analyze knowledge by adding a fourth element to JTB and reformulating knowledge …

Read More »

ON DEFENCE OF KRIPKE: NECESSARY A POSTERIORI PROPOSITION (pages 33-38)

Seyyed Mohammad Ali HODJATI ABSTRACT: One of Kripke’s innovations concerning the philosophy of language is the doctrine that the truth of some metaphysically necessary propositions is only known a posteriori. The typical example he gives is the identity statement consists of two different proper names that refer to the same referent, like “Hesperus = Phosphorus”. By metaphysically necessary he means …

Read More »

PROVIDING STABILITY TO OUR WORLD. IDENTITY AND TRANSFERENCE: GEACH AND QUINE (pages 37-56)

Olga RAMÍREZ ABSTRACT: The problem of identity is central to epistemic transference. However, relative identity appears to be the only way to work out an epistemic useful notion of identity. Relative identity, on its part, is either parasitic on strict identity or not identity at all. If, on the contrary, we ought for a strict concept of identity capable of …

Read More »

AGAINST EPISTEMIC AKRASIA (pages 57-79)

Ioannis TELIOS ABSTRACT: Arguments against epistemic akrasia have been met with counterexamples from the higher-order evidence literature. Here, I present two counterarguments to address these challenges. Firstly, the attitude reclassification argument disentangles reason-responsiveness from the constraints of evidentialism and allows for the adoption of conflicting propositions by coherent doxastic attitudes. Secondly, the failure reclassification argument demystifies the loss of doxastic …

Read More »