Logos & Episteme Logos & Episteme
UNIQUENESS AND LOGICAL DISAGREEMENT (pages 7-18)
Author: Frederik J. ANDERSENKeywords: logical disagreement , propositional justification , rational uniqueness , the uniqueness thesis
VOLUME XI ISSUE 1 March 2020
RESEARCH ARTICLES
Keywords: logical disagreement , propositional justification , rational uniqueness , the uniqueness thesis
THE CONFLICT OF RIGIDITY AND PRECISION IN DESIGNATION (pages 19-27)
Author: Daniele BERTINIKeywords: identity claims , imprecise designators , rigid designators , vagueness
HARDER, BETTER, FASTER, STRONGER: EPISTEMIC STANDARDS AND MORAL BELIEFS (pages 29-51)
Author: Nicole DULARKeywords: epistemic standards , moral disagreement , moral expertise , moral testimony
STAKES-SHIFTING CASES RECONSIDERED—WHAT SHIFTS? EPISTEMIC STANDARDS OR POSITION? (pages 53-76)
Author: Kok Yong LEEKeywords: contextualism , epistemic standard , intellectualism , relevant alternative , sensitivity , stakes-shifting cases
ON SOME ARGUMENTS FOR EPISTEMIC VALUE PLURALISM (pages 77-96)
Author: Timothy PERRINEKeywords: epistemic value , epistemic value monism , epistemic value pluralism , Jonathan Kvanvig , Michael DePaul
LUCK, KNOWLEDGE, AND EPISTEMIC PROBABILITY (pages 97-109)
Author: Gregory STOUTENBURGKeywords: epistemic probability account of luck , knowledge , luck
DISCUSSION NOTES/DEBATE
GETTIER BELIEFS AND SERIOUS BELIEFS: A REPLY TO BIRO AND FORRAI (pages 113-118)
Author: James SIMPSONKeywords: action , assert , Gabor Forrai , Gettier case , John Biro , serious belief
Logos & Episteme is an open access journal. All articles are free for anybody to read and download. They can also be distributed, copied and transmitted on the web, but only for non-commercial purposes, and provided that the journal copyright is acknowledged.