Logos and episteme
Arturs LOGINS
ABSTRACT: According to evidentialism, only evidential or truth-conducive reasons matter for the rationality of belief. According to pragmatism, pragmatic reasons can contribute to making a belief rational. The debate between evidentialism and pragmatism appears to have reached a stalemate. In this paper, we revisit the debate by focusing on the question and inquiry-sensitive view of belief and the idea that normative reasons are answers to normative questions. The focus on the question and inquiry-sensitive views of belief and reasons allows us to suggest a way to reconcile evidentialism and pragmatism and to move the debate about rational belief forward.
