Tag Archives: Paul Boghossian

AGAINST BOGHOSSIAN’S CASE FOR INCOMPATIBILISM (pages 285-306)

Simon DIERIG ABSTRACT: Two major objections have been raised to Boghossian’s discrimination argument for the incompatibility of externalism and self-knowledge. Proponents of the first objection claim that thoughts about “twin water” are not relevant alternatives to thoughts about water. Advocates of the second objection argue that the ability to rule out relevant alternatives is not required for knowledge. Even though it …

Read More »