Discussion Notes/Debate, XV, 3

Discussion Notes/Debate, XV, 3

DIVINE HIDDENNESS IS COSTLY FOR ATHEISTS (pages 353-357)

Perry HENDRICKS ABSTRACT: I’ve argued that those who endorse the argument from divine hiddenness must give up all pure de jure objections to theism, and this means that endorsing the argument is costly for atheists. Benjamin Curtis claims that this isn’t a significant cost for atheists. I show that—contrary to Curtis—there is a significant cost, and spell out why this …

Read More »

THE END OF THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS? (pages 359-367)

Mark MALLER ABSTRACT: This reply is a refutation of Santiago Vrech’s article “The End of the Case? A Metaphilosophical Critique of Thought Experiments” (2022) which argues that thought experiments used in argumentation cannot hold in All Possible Worlds (APW) modality, and thus should end. Cases are used to justify or refute a philosophical theory, but should not have the power …

Read More »