Colin RULOFF

NO PARADOX FOR CONCILIATIONISM (pages 71-80)

Colin RULOFF ABSTRACT: In a widely cited paper, Thomas Mulligan argues that conciliationism generates three paradoxes or puzzles when this theory is applied to a class of propositions related to epistemic peerhood. Mulligan claims that these three paradoxes not only pose a significant theoretical challenge to conciliationism, but that they are potentially fatal to the theory. In what follows, I …

Read More »