PEER DISAGREEMENT: SPECIAL CASES (pages 221-226)

Eric WILAND

ABSTRACT: When you discover that an epistemic peer disagrees with you about some matter, does rationality require you to alter your views? Concessivists answer in the affirmative, but their view faces a problem in special cases. As others have noted, if concessivism itself is what’s under dispute, then concessivism seems to undermine itself. But there are other unexplored special cases too. This article identifies three such special cases, and argues that concessivists in fact face no special problem.

application-pdf Download PDF

Optimizare SEO Carucioare copii Carucioare 3 in 1