CONSISTENCY AND SHIFTS IN GETTIER CASES (pages 331-343)

Andreas STEPHENS

ABSTRACT: Two Gettier cases are described in detail and it is shown how they unfold in terms of reflective and reflexive desiderata. It is argued that the Gettier problem does not pose a problem for conceptions of knowledge as long as we are consistent in how we understand justification and knowledge. It is only by reading the cases with a reflective understanding of justification but a reflexive understanding of knowledge, without acknowledging that this takes place, that the cases become ‘problems.’

application-pdf Download PDF

Check Also

MAKE INFORMATION IN SCIENCE MEANINGFUL AGAIN (pages 263-286)

Javier ANTA ABSTRACT: Although the everyday notion of information has clear semantic properties, the all-pervasive …